At last, there is a hint that President Obama might someday spend a nickel of his fast-diminishing political capital on reforming marijuana laws.
White House spokesman Josh Earnest addressed marijuana reform at the daily press briefing earlier this week. “The president does not, at this point, advocate a change in the law,” Earnest said, though he added that Obama does not think cracking down on individual marijuana users is a good use of federal resources, either.
What makes this different from the many other measured comments Obama has made on the subject since he took office?
For one thing, the timing is telling. The White House’s comment comes on the heels of the announcement that the Justice Department will no longer pursue mandatory minimum sentences for certain low-level nonviolent drug offenses. Meanwhile, states that have passed legalization laws, especially Colorado and Washington, continue to wait for a clear signal from the Justice Department on how it will respond to the conflict of state and federal law on the issue.
Many have also interpreted the comments as an indirect response to a column by Sanjay Gupta, CNN’s chief medical correspondent. Gupta, a neurosurgeon as well as a former adviser to Hillary Clinton, was reportedly offered the position of surgeon general in 2009, though he withdrew his name from consideration. Gupta’s Aug. 9 column garnered quite a bit of attention - especially as it represented a reversal of his previous position on marijuana use.
“We have been terribly and systematically misled for nearly 70 years in the United States,” Gupta wrote, “and I apologize for my own role in that.” The column explains that Gupta has been since convinced by evidence that cannabis has low abuse potential and legitimate medical applications that can’t be easily duplicated by alternatives.
Legalization advocates hoped that Gupta’s column might trigger a similar reversal - or, perhaps more aptly, an evolution - in the president’s position. After all, the president has already shown that his stance on social issues can turn on a dime once popular sentiment is behind him. (His evolution on marriage equality springs to mind.) I have always assumed that Obama, whose past use of marijuana is no secret, is privately in favor of legalization as long as it doesn’t hurt him politically. This stance has led him to his public position that the government has “bigger fish to fry” than fixing pointless laws rooted in untruth that brand thousands of Americans as criminals every day.
Yet the resources currently spent on pursuing the “war on drugs” on the enforcement side, not to mention the strain on our court system in dealing with the offenders, mean this issue is not as small as Obama has previously suggested. A recent report from the ACLU that focused on the disparity between arrests for possession between white and black offenders also observed that marijuana possession charges make up nearly half of total drug arrests.
Yesterday would not have been soon enough to end this craziness. I have written often about the nonsensical stance the federal government has been forced to take as it holds two contradictory ideas about marijuana at once - that it is one of the most dangerous drugs available and has no valid medical use on the one hand, and that it is a relatively low-priority issue that states can handle on the other. Holding both ideas is untenable, especially now that state positions have shifted.
The political winds may be gathering enough force to push the president where he ought to be going. This is a chief executive who has the courage of his pollsters’ convictions. Twenty states, as well as the District of Columbia, have voted to approve marijuana for medical applications; two have decriminalized cannabis entirely.
This momentum is going to force the president into a choice sooner or later. It is becoming clearer that he wants to leave the door open to make the right one whenever he eventually decides to step through.
Larry M. Elkin is the founder and president of Palisades Hudson, and is based out of Palisades Hudson’s Fort Lauderdale, Florida headquarters. He wrote several of the chapters in the firm’s recently updated book,
Looking Ahead: Life, Family, Wealth and Business After 55. His contributions include Chapter 1, “Looking Ahead When Youth Is Behind Us,” and Chapter 4, “The Family Business.” Larry was also among the authors of the firm’s book
The High Achiever’s Guide To Wealth.
Posted by Larry M. Elkin, CPA, CFP®
photo by Matthew Kenwrick
At last, there is a hint that President Obama might someday spend a nickel of his fast-diminishing political capital on reforming marijuana laws.
White House spokesman Josh Earnest addressed marijuana reform at the daily press briefing earlier this week. “The president does not, at this point, advocate a change in the law,” Earnest said, though he added that Obama does not think cracking down on individual marijuana users is a good use of federal resources, either.
What makes this different from the many other measured comments Obama has made on the subject since he took office?
For one thing, the timing is telling. The White House’s comment comes on the heels of the announcement that the Justice Department will no longer pursue mandatory minimum sentences for certain low-level nonviolent drug offenses. Meanwhile, states that have passed legalization laws, especially Colorado and Washington, continue to wait for a clear signal from the Justice Department on how it will respond to the conflict of state and federal law on the issue.
Many have also interpreted the comments as an indirect response to a column by Sanjay Gupta, CNN’s chief medical correspondent. Gupta, a neurosurgeon as well as a former adviser to Hillary Clinton, was reportedly offered the position of surgeon general in 2009, though he withdrew his name from consideration. Gupta’s Aug. 9 column garnered quite a bit of attention - especially as it represented a reversal of his previous position on marijuana use.
“We have been terribly and systematically misled for nearly 70 years in the United States,” Gupta wrote, “and I apologize for my own role in that.” The column explains that Gupta has been since convinced by evidence that cannabis has low abuse potential and legitimate medical applications that can’t be easily duplicated by alternatives.
Legalization advocates hoped that Gupta’s column might trigger a similar reversal - or, perhaps more aptly, an evolution - in the president’s position. After all, the president has already shown that his stance on social issues can turn on a dime once popular sentiment is behind him. (His evolution on marriage equality springs to mind.) I have always assumed that Obama, whose past use of marijuana is no secret, is privately in favor of legalization as long as it doesn’t hurt him politically. This stance has led him to his public position that the government has “bigger fish to fry” than fixing pointless laws rooted in untruth that brand thousands of Americans as criminals every day.
Yet the resources currently spent on pursuing the “war on drugs” on the enforcement side, not to mention the strain on our court system in dealing with the offenders, mean this issue is not as small as Obama has previously suggested. A recent report from the ACLU that focused on the disparity between arrests for possession between white and black offenders also observed that marijuana possession charges make up nearly half of total drug arrests.
Yesterday would not have been soon enough to end this craziness. I have written often about the nonsensical stance the federal government has been forced to take as it holds two contradictory ideas about marijuana at once - that it is one of the most dangerous drugs available and has no valid medical use on the one hand, and that it is a relatively low-priority issue that states can handle on the other. Holding both ideas is untenable, especially now that state positions have shifted.
The political winds may be gathering enough force to push the president where he ought to be going. This is a chief executive who has the courage of his pollsters’ convictions. Twenty states, as well as the District of Columbia, have voted to approve marijuana for medical applications; two have decriminalized cannabis entirely.
This momentum is going to force the president into a choice sooner or later. It is becoming clearer that he wants to leave the door open to make the right one whenever he eventually decides to step through.
Related posts:
No related posts.
The views expressed in this post are solely those of the author. We welcome additional perspectives in our comments section as long as they are on topic, civil in tone and signed with the writer's full name. All comments will be reviewed by our moderator prior to publication.